- 63 - officer, petitioner’s offer of $139,776 in petitioner’s June 24, 2005 offer-in-compromise did not equal or exceed that RCP. On the record before us, we find that the settlement officer took into consideration whether the proposed collection action with respect to petitioner’s unpaid liabilities for 1990, 1991, 1992, 1994, 1996, 1997, and 2002 balanced the need for the efficient collection of those liabilities with the legitimate concern of petitioner that that collection action be no more intrusive than necessary. See sec. 6330(c)(3)(C). Based upon our examination of the entire record before us, we find that respondent did not abuse respondent’s discretion in making the determinations in the notice of determination with respect to petitioner’s unpaid liabilities for 1990, 1991, 1992, 1994, 1996, 1997, and 2002. On that record, we sustain those determinations. We have considered all of the contentions and arguments of petitioner that are not discussed herein, and we find them to be without merit, irrelevant, and/or moot. On the record before us, we shall grant respondent’s motion. To reflect the foregoing, An order granting respondent’s motion and decision for respondent will be entered.Page: Previous 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63Last modified: March 27, 2008