Menard, Inc. - Page 7




                                        - 7 -                                         
          holding in Menard I recharacterizing a portion of the                       
          compensation that Menards paid to Mr. Menard as a constructive              
          dividend, they overpaid so much of the hospital tax that they               
          remitted to the Commissioner during 1998 as was attributable to             
          the constructive dividend.  Petitioners argue that, under the               
          doctrine of equitable recoupment, they are entitled to offset the           
          amount of their hospital tax overpayments against their                     
          respective income tax deficiencies for TYE 1998 and that they               
          have met all of the requirements necessary to establish their               
          equitable recoupment defense.4                                              
               Respondent maintains that the Court lacks the authority                
          under the equitable recoupment doctrine to offset petitioners’              
          income tax deficiencies by the amounts of their overpaid hospital           
          taxes because we lack jurisdiction over hospital tax deficiencies           
          and overpayments.  Respondent contends that hospital taxes play             
          no role in the determination of a deficiency within the meaning             
          of section 6211 and that neither additional hospital tax                    
          liabilities nor hospital tax overpayments are included in a                 


               3(...continued)                                                        
          circumstances, the Court does not consider petitioners’ equitable           
          recoupment claim to be a “new issue” within the meaning of Rule             
          155, and respondent does not contend otherwise.                             
               4Petitioners also asserted that respondent should be                   
          equitably estopped from refusing to consider their overpayments             
          of hospital tax in the course of computing their correct tax                
          liabilities.  However, petitioners failed to develop this                   
          argument with any specificity, and we decline to address it.                






Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: March 27, 2008