Menard, Inc. - Page 8




                                        - 8 -                                         
          computation for entry of decision because we lack jurisdiction              
          over hospital taxes.  According to respondent, applying equitable           
          recoupment in this case “would allow petitioners to slip through            
          a back door to challenge a tax they could not directly petition             
          the Court to review.”                                                       
               Respondent does not dispute the amount by which petitioners            
          contend they overpaid their hospital taxes, nor does respondent             
          dispute that the elements necessary for an equitable recoupment             
          claim are present in this case.5                                            
               Neither Menards nor Mr. Menard filed a claim for a refund of           
          the hospital taxes that they overpaid.  The period of                       
          limitations for filing a refund claim has now expired with                  
          respect to both petitioners.                                                
               We have not yet entered decisions in these cases, and                  
          consequently no decision has become final within the meaning of             
          section 7481.                                                               
                                     Discussion                                       
               These cases present an issue of first impression regarding             
          the scope of our authority to apply the doctrine of equitable               


               5Respondent did not raise any specific challenge to Mr.                
          Menard’s computations.  Respondent does assert, however, that               
          assuming equitable recoupment is available in this case,                    
          petitioner Menard, Inc., erred in computing the amount of its               
          income tax deficiency, after accounting for the offset of                   
          hospital tax.  We shall discuss this issue in greater detail                
          below.                                                                      







Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: March 27, 2008