Evans v. United States, 504 U.S. 255, 43 (1992)

Page:   Index   Previous  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43

Cite as: 504 U. S. 255 (1992)

Thomas, J., dissenting

abuse, of course, is particularly grave in the inherently political context of public corruption prosecutions.

In my view, Evans is plainly innocent of extortion.9 With all due respect, I am compelled to dissent.

297

9 Evans also was convicted of filing a false income tax return. He now challenges that conviction on the ground that the jury was given improper instructions. He did not, however, challenge those instructions at trial or in the Court of Appeals. Thus, his current challenge is not properly before this Court. See Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. August, 450 U. S. 346, 362 (1981); Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co., 398 U. S. 144, 147, n. 2 (1970).

Page:   Index   Previous  29  30  31  32  33  34  35  36  37  38  39  40  41  42  43

Last modified: October 4, 2007