Rice v. Cayetano, 528 U.S. 495, 54 (2000)

Page:   Index   Previous  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54

548

RICE v. CAYETANO

Ginsburg, J., dissenting

Americans). Congress' prerogative to enter into special trust relationships with indigenous peoples, Morton v. Mancari, 417 U. S. 535 (1974), as Justice Stevens cogently explains, is not confined to tribal Indians. In particular, it encompasses native Hawaiians, whom Congress has in numerous statutes reasonably treated as qualifying for the special status long recognized for other once-sovereign indigenous peoples. See ante, at 533-534, and n. 9 (Stevens, J., dissenting). That federal trust responsibility, both the Court and Justice Stevens recognize, has been delegated by Congress to the State of Hawaii. Both the Office of Hawaiian Affairs and the voting scheme here at issue are "tied rationally to the fulfillment" of that obligation. See Mancari, 417 U. S., at 555. No more is needed to demonstrate the validity of the Office and the voting provision under the Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments.

Page:   Index   Previous  40  41  42  43  44  45  46  47  48  49  50  51  52  53  54

Last modified: October 4, 2007