Cite as: 534 U. S. 407 (2002)
Scalia, J., dissenting
A jury determined beyond a reasonable doubt that respondent suffers from antisocial personality disorder combined with exhibitionism, and that this is either a mental abnormality or a personality disorder making it likely he will commit repeat acts of sexual violence. That is all the SVPA requires, and all the Constitution demands. Since we have already held precisely that in another case (which, by a remarkable feat of jurisprudential jujitsu the Court relies upon as the only authority for its decision), I would reverse the judgment below.
425
Page: Index Previous 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19Last modified: October 4, 2007