Doe v. Chao, 540 U.S. 614, 30 (2004)

Page:   Index   Previous  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30

Cite as: 540 U. S. 614 (2004)

Breyer, J., dissenting

Justice Ginsburg's interpretation would not risk injury to the public fisc. And I consequently find no support in any of the statute's basic purposes for the majority's restrictive reading of the damages provision.

643

Page:   Index   Previous  16  17  18  19  20  21  22  23  24  25  26  27  28  29  30

Last modified: October 4, 2007