Ex parte PELTZER - Page 12




                Appeal No. 95-2454                                                                                                           
                Application No. 07/396,733                                                                                                   


                reasonable guidance to those working in the art of the depth of the oxide filled grooves that may reasonably                 
                be used.                                                                                                                     
                        Applicant also argues that the examiner has improperly used applicant’s claims as a road map for                     
                combining the references using impermissible hindsight.  Brief p. 14-17.  We disagree.                                       
                        In one sense every obviousness rejection is based on hindsight.  An examination of an invention for                  
                patentability cannot take place without first knowing what the invention is and then looking for the relevant                
                prior art with knowledge of the claimed invention.  Thus, merely asserting that a rejection uses hindsight                   
                reasoning is not helpful to deciding the obviousness issue. As noted by the CCPA:                                            
                                 Any judgement on obviousness is in a sense necessarily a reconstruction based                               
                                 upon hindsight reasoning, but so long as it takes into account only knowledge                               
                                 which was within the level of ordinary skill at the time the claimed invention was                          
                                 made and does not include knowledge gleaned only from applicant's disclosure,                               
                                 such a reconstruction is proper.                                                                            
                In re McLaughlin, 443 F.2d 1392, 1395, 170 USPQ 209, 212 (CCPA 1971).  The information used in                               
                rejecting the claimed subject matter is disclosed in the prior art and is, therefore, within the level of ordinary           
                skill in the art.  The rejection was not based on information gleaned only from applicant’s disclosure.  In                  
                our  view,  impermissible  hindsight  was  not  used  in  rejecting  the  claimed  subject  matter.                          
                        Applicant notes that independent claims 14 and 36 each require 5 steps:                                              
                                 (1) growing an epi layer on a silicon substrate of opposite conductivity type to the                        
                                 epi to form a laterally extending PN isolation junction, (2) forming an oxygen -                            
                                 impervious insulation layer on the epi, (3) creating one or more openings through                           
                                 the insulation layer, (4) removing exposed epi silicon to form one or more                                  
                                 depressions extending partway through the epi, and (5) thermally oxidizing silicon                          
                                 exposed through each depression to form an isolation region of oxidized silicon                             
                                 that extends down to the PN junction so as to divide the epi into a plurality of                            





                                                                     12                                                                      





Page:  Previous  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  19  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007