Ex parte PELTZER - Page 11




                Appeal No. 95-2454                                                                                                           
                Application No. 07/396,733                                                                                                   


                In re Farrenkopf, 713 F.2d 714, 718, 219 USPQ 1, 4 (Fed.  Cir. 1983) citing Orthopedic Equipment Co.                         
                v. United States, 702 F.2d 1005, 1013, 217 USPQ 193, 200 (Fed. Cir. 1983).  Thus, the question is one                        
                of technical rather than commercial feasibility.  Applicant has not provided any evidence which shows that                   
                those having ordinary skill in the art would have recognized a technological incompatibility.  Nor has                       
                applicant directed us to any evidence which supports the argument that  “it is extremely unlikely that it                    
                would be commercially feasible to grow a thermal recessed oxide to a thickness in the vicinity of 10                         
                microns.”  Argument of counsel on appeal cannot substitute for evidence. Weinar v. Rollform Inc., 744                        
                F.2d 797, 806, 223 USPQ 369, 374 (Fed. Cir. 1984); Knorr v. Pearson, 671 F.2d 1368, 1373, 213                                
                USPQ 196, 200 (CCPA 1982) ; In re Greenfield, 571 F.2d 1185, 1189, 197 USPQ 227, 230 (CCPA                                   
                1978); In re Langer, 503 F.2d 1380, 1395, 183 USPQ 288, 299 (CCPA 1974).                                                     
                        In any event, we find that the person having ordinary skill in the art would not interpret Frouin’s                  
                teachings as being limited to epitaxial layers of at least 10 microns.  While Frouin’s specific examples                     
                describe an epitaxial layer of 10 microns, it is axiomatic that a reference must be considered in its entirety,              
                and it is well established that the disclosure of a reference is not limited to specific working examples                    
                contained therein. In re Fracalossi, 681 F.2d 792, 794 n.1, 215 USPQ 569, 570 n.1  (CCPA 1982);  In                          
                re Lamberti, 545 F.2d 747, 750, 192 USPQ 278, 280 (CCPA 1976).  Nothing in Frouin indicates that                             
                thickness of the epitaxial or other layers is of significance in obtaining an operative integrated circuit device.           
                The other references of record clearly teach that those working in the integrated circuit art were aware of                  
                the manufacturing techniques using thin epitaxial layers.  For example, Murphy teaches the use of a one                      
                micron thick epitaxial layer is conventional in the art.  Murphy, col. 5, lines 2-7.  In addition, we find that              
                the person having ordinary skill in the art would have recognized the reasonable limits of the Murphy’s                      
                depression filling procedure.  Murphy teaches that 440 angstroms (.44 microns) of silicon is consumed for                    
                every 1000 angstroms (1 micron) of silicon oxide formed.  See, Murphy, col.  2, lines 62-65.  This gives                     



                                                                     11                                                                      





Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007