Ex parte NISHINO - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
               The opinion in support of the decision being entered                   
               today (1) was not written for publication in a law                     
               journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                 
                                   _______________                                    
                                                            Paper No. 22              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                       
                                                                                     

                         BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                 AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                                                                     

                               Ex parte TOMOKI NISHINO                                
                                                                                     
                                 Appeal No. 96-0523                                   
                               Application 07/910,7631                                
                                                                                     
                              HEARD:  January 12, 1998                                
                                                                                     
          Before BARRETT, LEE, and TORCZON, Administrative Patent                     
          Judges.                                                                     
          BARRETT, Administrative Patent Judge.                                       


            Application for patent filed July 8, 1992, entitled1                                                                      
          "Semiconductor Wafer," which claims the foreign priority                    
          benefit under 35 U.S.C. § 119 of Japanese Application                       
          3-178372, filed July 18, 1991.  Counsel for appellant                       
          indicated at the oral hearing that there are no related                     
          appeals and that Sony Corporation is the real party in                      
          interest.                                                                   
                                        - 1 -                                         





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007