(1) the Huang request for reconsideration of the decision
denying Huang preliminary motion 1 and
(2) priority
A. Findings of fact
The record supports, by a preponderance of the evidence,
the following findings, as well as any findings set out in the
discussion portion of this ORDER.
The interference
1. The interference involves a Huang application
versus a Prasit application.
Junior party
2. The junior party is Horng-Chin Huang and David
B. Reitz ("Huang").
3. Huang is involved in the interference on the
basis of its U.S. application 08/541,850("'850"), filed 10
October 1995.
4. Huang has not been accorded the benefit of the
filing date of any other application for the purpose of
priority.
5. The real party in interest is G.D. Searle and
Company ("Searle"). Searle is said to be a wholly-owned
2
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007