THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte PAUL K. HANNA and ANDREZEJ M. PIOTROWSKI
_____________
Appeal No. 94-0898
Application No. 07/785,6441
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before CAROFF, KIMLIN and JOHN D. SMITH,, Administrative Patent
Judges.
CAROFF, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of
claims 1-4 and 7-8. Claims 5-6, the only other claims in the
Hanna et al application, were merely objected to by the examiner
and, therefore, are not before us for consideration.
1 Application for patent filed October 31, 1991, which is
according to appellants, a continuation-In-Part of application
07/602,533, filed October 24, 1990, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007