Ex parte PAUL K. HANNA, et al. - Page 1

                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                       
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)               
          was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not              
          binding precedent of the Board.                                              
                                                             Paper No. 17              

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                        
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                  Ex parte PAUL K. HANNA and ANDREZEJ M. PIOTROWSKI                    
                                  Appeal No. 94-0898                                   
                             Application No. 07/785,6441                               
                                       ON BRIEF                                        
          Before CAROFF, KIMLIN and JOHN D. SMITH,, Administrative Patent              
          CAROFF, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         
                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               This is a decision on appeal from the final rejection of                
          claims 1-4 and 7-8.  Claims 5-6, the only other claims in the                
          Hanna et al application, were merely objected to by the examiner             
          and, therefore, are not before us for consideration.                         
               1 Application for patent filed October 31, 1991, which is               
          according to appellants, a continuation-In-Part of application               
          07/602,533, filed October 24, 1990, now abandoned.                           


Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007