THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 18 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _____________ Ex parte DANIEL J. HALLORAN and JUDITH M. VINCENT _____________ Appeal No. 95-1302 Application 07/729,2811 ______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before WINTERS, WILLIAM F. SMITH and GRON, Administrative Patent Judges. WINTERS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL In Paper No. 15 filed November 15, 1993, applicants appealed to the Board from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 17 through 26. However, it is clear from the appeal Brief (Paper No. 16 filed January 18, 1994) that applicants withdrew their 1 Application for patent filed July 12, 1991. According to appellants, the application is a continuation of Application 07/548,810, filed July 6, 1990, now Patent No. 5,075,103, granted December 24, 1991. 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007