THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 15
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte EDWARD D. KLOMP,
STEPHEN F. DE NAGEL and
ARUN S. P. SOLOMON
_____________
Appeal No. 96-3445
Application 08/233,0881
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before LYDDANE, STAAB and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges.
CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner’s final
rejection of claims 2 and 3. Claims 1 and 4 have been canceled.
1Application for patent filed April 25, 1994.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007