Ex parte EDWARD D. KLOMP, et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 96-3445                                                          
          Application 08/233,088                                                      


               Appellants’ claimed invention is directed to an injector               
          for delivering fuel and air to an engine.  Claim 2 is exemplary             
          of the subject matter on appeal and recites:                                
               2.  An injector for delivering a charge of fuel and air to             
          an engine, said injector including a body having a central                  
          passage extending to a valve seat, a poppet valve secured on a              
          valve stem extending through the central passage and engageable             
          with the valve seat to control flow therethrough, an air inlet              
          opening into the central passage, a fuel nozzle opening into the            
          central passage near the valve seat, a valve periodically                   
          metering fuel through the nozzle into the central passage to                
          create a fuel-air charge in the central passage, and an actuator            
          periodically disengaging the poppet valve from the valve seat to            
          deliver the fuel-air charge from the central passage, wherein the           
          valve stem includes a valve disc that sealingly engages the                 
          central passage, and wherein the volume of the central passage              
          between the valve seat and the valve disc is in the range of                
          about ten to about twenty times the maximum volume of the fuel              
          delivered through the nozzle during a fuel metering event.                  
                                    THE REFERENCE                                     
               The following reference was relied on by the examiner in a             
          rejection of the claims under 35 USC § 103:                                 
          McKay                    4,841,942                Jun. 27, 1989             



                                    THE REJECTION                                     
               Claims 2 and 3 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 over               
          McKay.                                                                      
               The examiner found that the claimed invention differs                  
          from the McKay patent by its recitation of a disc valve but that            

                                          2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007