Appeal No. 96-3445 Application 08/233,088 the inventor taught is used against its teacher. In our view, the examiner’s finding is based on impermissible hindsight derived from the appellants’ disclosure and therefore, we will not sustain the examiner’s rejection of claims 2 and 3 under 35 U.S.C. §103. The decision of the examiner is reversed. REVERSED ) WILLIAM E. LYDDANE ) Administrative Patent Judge ) ) ) ) BOARD OF PATENT LAWRENCE J. STAAB ) Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND ) ) INTERFERENCES ) MURRIEL E. CRAWFORD ) Administrative Patent Judge ) 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007