THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is
not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 32
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte ADRIAAN F.M. LEENAARS,
and JACQUES J. VAN DEKEL
_____________
Appeal No. 94-3000
Application 07/914,6541
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before KIMLIN, WEIFFENBACH and PAK, Administrative Patent
Judges.
PAK, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
1Application for patent filed July 15, 1992. According
to applicants, this application is a continuation of
Application 07/701,295, filed May 13, 1991, now abandoned,
which is a continuation of Application 07/467,718, filed
January 19, 1990, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007