THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 27 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte RAINER A. SCHRAIVOGEL and GUIDO PLANGGER ____________ Appeal No. 94-3349 Application 07/757,0851 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before JERRY SMITH, BARRETT and CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judges. CRAWFORD, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on an appeal from the examiner's final rejection of claims 9, 10, 33, 34 and 36-40. Claims 2, 4- 8, 12, 13, 15, 16, 18-20, 22-25 and 41-45 have been found Application for patent filed September 10, 1991.1 -1-Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007