Ex parte FERRY et al. - Page 11




          Appeal No. 95-1292                                                          
          Application 07/911,471                                                      
               preserved.  Claim 16 requires the signal to be an NTSC                 
               signal.  Both Takabayashi and Ueno transmit caller                     
               information to a television.  Ueno further teaches                     
               transmitting third-party caller information to the                     
               television while the first communication path is preserved.            
               As we noted earlier, anyone implementing the                           
               Takabayashi/Ueno system on a standard television in the                
               United States (or Japan for that matter) would have used an            
               NTSC signal because the NTSC set the standard for television           
               signals.                                                               
          K    Claims 17-21 require displaying the caller information in an           
               alphanumeric format, including at least either a telephone             
               number or a name.  Takabayashi teaches displaying the name             
               as an improvement over the existing practice of displaying             
               the number.  One skilled in the art would have been                    
               motivated to choose at least one or the other for display on           
               a conventional television set.  Although a name is easier to           
               comprehend, the number is more convenient for returning the            
               call later.  One skilled in the art would likely provide               
               both since the same character generator can easily produce             
               both.  In any case, the choice between these two known                 
               options (each with advantages and not mutually exclusive)              
               does not present a patentable distinction.                             

                                       - 11 -                                         





Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007