Appeal No. 95-1292 Application 07/911,471 and 13-21 in view of Takabayashi and Ueno (Paper 11 at 2); claims 5 and 12 in view of Takabayashi, Ueno, and Griffith (Paper 11 at 4); claims 1, 2, 4, 6-9, 11, 13-16, 18, and 20 in view of Krisbergh and Ueno (Paper 11 at 5); claims 17, 19, and 21 in view of Krisbergh, Ueno, and Takabayashi (Paper 11 at 7); claims 5 and 12 in view of Krisbergh, Ueno, and Griffith (Paper 11 at 7). Fact findings 7 through 11 would have been known to a person having ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention. G The Takabayashi reference teaches a caller ID system in which the name of the caller is displayed on a conventional television screen. (Abstract; p. 1.) Takabayashi notes that displaying the caller's name is an improvement over the prior art, which only displayed the caller's telephone number. (p. 1-2.) He does not disclose the display of a third-party's information when the telephone is already in use. H The Ueno reference is directed to displaying a third-party caller ("C") using a "TV phone" to one of two callers ("A" and "B") already in conversation using a TV phone system. According to Ueno, the prior art only permitted a kind of Call Waiting function, where if C called B, B would have to put A on hold to learn the identity of C. As Ueno notes, if - 4 -Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007