Ex parte FERRY et al. - Page 15




          Appeal No. 95-1292                                                          
          Application 07/911,471                                                      
                                      DECISION                                        
               We affirm the rejection of claims 1, 2, 8, 9, and 15-21 as             
          obvious in view of Takabayashi and Ueno.  We reverse this                   
          rejection as applied to claims 4, 6, 7, 11, 13, and 14.  We also            
          reverse the rejection of claims 5 and 12 as obvious in view of              
          Takabayashi, Ueno, and Griffith.                                            
               We also affirm the rejection under section 103 of claims 1,            
          2, 8, 9, 15, 16, 18, and 20 in view of Krisbergh and Ueno and of            
          claims 17, 19, and 21 in view of Takabayashi, Ueno, and                     
          Krisbergh.  We reverse the rejection under section 103 of                   
          claims 4, 6, 7, 11, 13, and 14 in view of Krisbergh and Ueno.  We           
          also reverse the rejection of claims 5 and 12 as obvious in view            
          of Krisbergh, Ueno, and Griffith.                                           

















                                       - 15 -                                         





Page:  Previous  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  15  16  17  18  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007