THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
This opinion was not written for publication
and is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 21
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte THOMAS FERRY and JANN WILSON
____________
Appeal No. 95-1292
Application 07/911,471
____________
ON BRIEF1
____________
Before KRASS, JERRY SMITH, and TORCZON, Administrative Patent
Judges.
TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judge.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
FINDINGS OF FACT
We have reviewed the record in its entirety in light of the
arguments of Applicants and the examiner. Our decision presumes
familiarity with the entire record. A preponderance of the
evidence of record supports each of the following fact findings.
A. The nature of the case
A This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the final
rejection of claims 1, 2, 4-9, and 11-21, which are all of
1 Applicants waived the hearing. (Paper 20.)
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007