THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. Paper No. 41 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE ____________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES ____________ Ex parte NANETTE BROWN ____________ Appeal No. 95-1955 Application 08/109,9821 ____________ ON BRIEF ____________ Before URYNOWICZ, KRASS and LEE, Administrative Patent Judges. LEE, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final rejection of claims 10-12, all of which are independent claims. No claim has been allowed. Reference Relied on by the Examiner Nibby, Jr. et al. Patent No. 4,527,251 Jul. 2, 1985 (Nibby) Application for patent filed August 23, 1993. According to the appellant, it is a continuation application of application 07/827,911, filed on January 31, 1992, now abandoned, which is a continuation application of application 07/292,195, filed on December 30, 1988, also now abandoned. -1-Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007