Appeal No. 95-2081
Application 07/825,778
Claims 1 through 22, 27, 30, 33, 34 and 38 stand
rejected and are before us on appeal;
Claims 23 through 26, 28, 29, 31 and 32 are objected
to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim and are
indicated to be allowable if rewritten in independent form
including all of the limitations of the base claim and any
intervening claims; and
Claims 35 through 37 and claims 39 through 41 stand
allowed.
Appellant's invention is directed to an improved
propulsion system for a power boat. Claim 1 is representative
of the subject matter on appeal and a copy of that claim, as
it appears in the Appendix to appellant's brief, is attached
to this decision.
The prior art references of record relied upon by
the examiner in rejecting the appealed claims are:
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007