Ex parte VAN TASSEL - Page 9




          Appeal No. 95-2081                                                          
          Application 07/825,778                                                      



          no evidence that "a usual size" for a propeller such as (25)                
          of Small is four inches, as is                                              




          urged in the examiner's answer.  Appellant contends (reply                  
          brief, page 9) that a four inch propeller "is only used on the              
          smallest                                                                    
          of outboard motors and is not suitable for power boats to                   
          which the present invention would be applied."  The examiner                
          has not responded to this argument.                                         


                    With regard to the position that the size of the                  
          wall (24) of Small is merely a matter of design choice and                  
          within the level of skill in the art, we look to Figure 6 of                
          Small and note that with the passage of the propeller shaft                 
          (26) through the wall (24) at the stuffing box (29), it is                  
          highly unlikely, if not impossible, that one of ordinary skill              
          in the art would have been led to size the wall (24) of Small               
          with a vertical height of approximately one inch, as the                    
          examiner urges.                                                             

                                          9                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  14  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007