Appeal No. 95-2081 Application 07/825,778 Sherman 3,793,980 Feb. 26, 1974 Small 4,689,026 Aug. 25, 1987 The claims remaining on appeal stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as follows: a) claims 1, 3, 6, 7, 10, 12, 15, 18, 21, 27, 30, 33 and 38 under § 103 as being unpatentable over Small; and b) claims 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 13, 14, 16, 17, 19, 20, 22 and 34 under § 103 as being unpatentable over Small in view of Sherman. Rather than reiterate the examiner's full explana- tion of the above-noted rejections and the conflicting view- points advanced by the examiner and appellant regarding those rejections, we make reference to the final rejection (Paper No. 24, mailed January 7, 1993), the examiner's answer (Paper No. 29, mailed February 22, 1994) and to the supplemental examiner's answer (Paper No. 32, mailed November 16, 1994) for the examiner's complete reasoning in support of the rejec- 4Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007