Paper No. 29
THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_______________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_______________
Ex parte KENDALL S. WILLS
and PAUL A. RODRIGUEZ
______________
Appeal No. 95-2483
Application 08/098,0081
_______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before THOMAS, HAIRSTON and CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
Appellants have appealed to the Board from the examiner=s
final rejection of claims 1 to 6, 11 to 15, 26 to 29, 34 to 36
1 Application for patent filed July 27, 1993. According to appellants,
this application is a continuation of Application 07/817,972, filed January 6,
1992, now abandoned, which is continuation of Application 07/575,744, filed
August 31, 1990, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007