Appeal No. 95-2598 Application 08/021,230 manner urged by the examiner relying on the teachings of Ulrich, and for using a gum-coated paper tape and a moistening unit therein as further urged by the examiner, we still do not see that the resulting tape machine would include a tape feed assembly having all of the individual constituent units set forth in appellant's claim 1 on appeal. In particular, we fail to find in the modified Warshaw tape machine a tape feed unit and a contrast unit forming part of the tape feed assembly as required in claim 1 on appeal, and also any teaching or suggestion of those units being constructed and arranged to function in the manner set forth in appellant's claim 3 on appeal. Moreover, we fail to find in either of the applied references any teaching or suggestion of a removable tape feed assembly wherein the cartridge or assembly is disassembleable into its individual constituent components or units as required in appellant's claim 1. In this regard, we understand from appellant's disclosure, particularly Figure 5, that the last clause of claim 1 on appeal requires the specifically named units therein to be individual modules (units) that are separable from the tape feed assembly and each other to thereby facilitate ease of repair and replacement of such constituent units. No such 9Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007