THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 17
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte EDWARD F. DOWNS JR.
____________
Appeal No. 95-3273
Application 08/136,8561
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, MARTIN and LEE, Administrative Patent Judges.
MARTIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
from the examiner's rejections of claims 1-11, all of the pending
claims, over prior art. The final Office action (paper No. 6)
included a number of grounds of rejection, of which only the
rejection of claim 1 under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as anticipated by
Application for patent filed October 18, 1993.1
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007