Ex parte DOWNS - Page 11




          Appeal No. 95-3273                                                          
          Application 08/136,856                                                      

          away from using such a frame).  The rejection of claim 3 under              
           103 as unpatentable over Rokurota is therefore affirmed.                  
                    The rejection of claims 4-11 under  103 as                       
          unpatentable over Rokurota is also affirmed, because those claims           
          were not separately argued.  Nielson, 816 F.2d at 1572, 2 USPQ2d            
          at 1528.                                                                    
                    In summary, the rejection of claim 1 under 35  U.S.C.            
          102(b) as anticipated by Geil is affirmed, as are the rejection             
          of claims 1 and 2 under  102(b) as anticipated by Rokurota and             
          the rejection of claims 3-11 under  103 as unpatentable over               
          Rokurota.                                                                   




















                                         -11-                                         




Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  11  12  13  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007