Ex parte CROSSLAND et al. - Page 1




                                                        Paper No. 22                   

               THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                            
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                   
          (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                     
          (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                   

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                        
                                   _______________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                   _______________                                     
                            Ex parte WILLIAM A. CROSSLAND                              
                                 AND MARTIN J. BIRCH                                   
                                    ______________                                     
                                  Appeal No. 95-3285                                   
                              Application 07/984,4271                                  
                                   _______________                                     
                                   ON BRIEF                                            
                                   _______________                                     
          Before THOMAS, KRASS, and FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judges.             
          THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         
                                                                                      
                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               Appellants have appealed to the Board from the examiner’s               
          final rejection of claims 1 to 5, 8 to 10 and 13 to 17, which                
          constitute all the claims remaining in the application.                      


               Application for patent filed February 24, 1993.  According to1                                                                      
          applicants, this application is filed under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of GB/91/01537   
          filed September 10, 1991.                                                    

                                           1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007