Ex parte CROSSLAND et al. - Page 1




                                                        Paper No. 22                   

               THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                            
          The opinion in support of the decision being entered today                   
          (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and                     
          (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                   

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                        
                                   _______________                                     
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                   _______________                                     
                            Ex parte WILLIAM A. CROSSLAND                              
                                 AND MARTIN J. BIRCH                                   
                                    ______________                                     
                                  Appeal No. 95-3285                                   
                              Application 07/984,4271                                  
                                   _______________                                     
                                   ON BRIEF                                            
                                   _______________                                     
          Before THOMAS, KRASS, and FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judges.             
          THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         
                                                                                      
                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
               Appellants have appealed to the Board from the examiner’s               
          final rejection of claims 1 to 5, 8 to 10 and 13 to 17, which                
          constitute all the claims remaining in the application.                      


               Application for patent filed February 24, 1993.  According to1                                                                      
          applicants, this application is filed under 35 U.S.C.  371 of GB/91/01537   
          filed September 10, 1991.                                                    

                                           1                                           





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007