Paper No. 22 THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board. UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _______________ BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS AND INTERFERENCES _______________ Ex parte WILLIAM A. CROSSLAND AND MARTIN J. BIRCH ______________ Appeal No. 95-3285 Application 07/984,4271 _______________ ON BRIEF _______________ Before THOMAS, KRASS, and FLEMING, Administrative Patent Judges. THOMAS, Administrative Patent Judge. DECISION ON APPEAL Appellants have appealed to the Board from the examiner’s final rejection of claims 1 to 5, 8 to 10 and 13 to 17, which constitute all the claims remaining in the application. Application for patent filed February 24, 1993. According to1 applicants, this application is filed under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of GB/91/01537 filed September 10, 1991. 1Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007