Ex parte CROSSLAND et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 95-3285                                                           
          Application 07/984,427                                                       


               Representative claim 1 is reproduced below:                             
               1.  A method of addressing a liquid crystal cell having a               
          co-ordinate array of pixels, wherein data for refreshing the cell            
          is compared with the data existing prior to refresh to determine             
          those pixels which require to have their states changed, and                 
          wherein those pixels are accessed by developing a positive, or               
          negative, electric potential difference across those pixels,                 
          according into which state they are to be changed, for a                     
          predetermined period of time before re-establishing a zero                   
          potential difference, whereby no pixel is consecutively accessed             
          twice by the same polarity of potential difference.                          
               The following references are relied on by the examiner:                 
          Kawakami et al. (Kawakami)    4,062,626       Dec. 13, 1977                  
          Kaneko (Japanese Kokai)2      2-217,893       Aug. 30, 1990                  
               Claims 1 to 5, 8 to 10 and 13 to 17 stand rejected under                
          35 U.S.C. § 103.  As evidence of obviousness, the examiner relies            
          upon Kaneko in view of Kawakami.                                             
               We refer to the briefs and the answers for the respective               
          positions of the appellants and the examiner.                                
                                       OPINION                                         
               We reverse the rejection of all claims on appeal.                       
               According to Kaneko, the prior art arrangement in Figures               
          5 to 7 as discussed in this reference compares incoming data and             
          current data for each address of the display for each refresh or             


               Our understanding of this reference is based upon a translation2                                                                      
          provided the Scientific and Technical Information Center of the Patent and   
          Trademark Office.  A copy of the translation is enclosed with this decision. 

                                           2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007