Appeal No. 95-3285
Application 07/984,427
Finally, we note that the references relied upon and the
examiner do not appear to address the feature recited in each of
independent claims 3, 8 and 15 on appeal where any given pixel
state to be changed is taken from a potential equal to that of
the front plane electrode to a different potential for a
predetermined period of time before restoring it to its former
potential equal to that of the front plane electrode.
In view of the foregoing, the decision of the examiner
rejecting the claims on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 103 is reversed.
REVERSED
JAMES D. THOMAS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
)
ERROL A. KRASS ) BOARD OF PATENT
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
) INTERFERENCES
)
)
MICHAEL R. FLEMING )
Administrative Patent Judge )
6
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007