Appeal No. 95-3285
Application 07/984,427
polarity teachings that could be applicable to the positive or
negative polarity recitations in each of the respective claims on
appeal. This feature is recited in some manner in independent
claims 3, 8 and 15 in terms of pixel state changes being the
result of a different potential being applied to an individual
pixel area where the different potential is either a predeter-
mined amount above the potential of the front plane electrode
or an equal amount below it.
As indicated earlier, Kaneko’s liquid crystal display is
spoken of in that reference only in general terms. On the other
hand, Kawakami’s display per se is shown in corresponding figures
of Figures 12 and 13. The showings in and the corresponding
discussions of these figures indicate that each liquid crystal
cell or pixel essentially has its own discrete front and back
panel electrodes. Thus, there could be no corresponding
structural display among the references relied upon to meet the
limitations of independent claims 3, 8 and 15 that there is one
front plane electrode with respective corresponding electrode
pads on the other side of the display medium to comprise the
claimed coordinate array.
5
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007