Ex parte ARCHIBALD et al. - Page 1




                    THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                      
                The opinion in support of the decision being entered                   
          today (1) was not written for publication in a law                           
               journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                  

                                                        Paper No. 26                   

                      UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                        
                                      __________                                       
                          BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                           
                                  AND INTERFERENCES                                    
                                      __________                                       

                             Ex parte THOMAS G. ARCHIBALD                              
                                 and GERALD E. MANSER                                  
                                      _________                                        
                                  Appeal No. 95-3340                                   
                               Application 07/939,1721                                 
                                      _________                                        
                                       ON BRIEF                                        
                                      _________                                        
          Before RONALD H. SMITH, DOWNEY and HANLON, Administrative Patent             
          Judges.                                                                      
          DOWNEY, Administrative Patent Judge.                                         


                                  DECISION ON APPEAL                                   
                    This is an appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the final             
          rejection of claims 1-5.  Claims 6-10, still pending in the                  
          application, stand withdrawn from consideration by the examiner.             




           Application for patent filed September 2, 1992.1                                                                       





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007