Appeal No. 95-3340 Application 07/939,172 or: 1 2 R and R are combined as a single divalent radical which is a member selected from the group consisting of - N(NO )- and -N(NO )-CH -N(NO )-; and2 2 2 2 R is a member selected from the group3 consisting of NF , ONO , NO and N .2 2 2 3 All the claims stand or fall together. 37 C.F.R. § 1.192(c). (See Brief, page 4). Hence, we direct our attention to claim 1 with respect to the rejections. The references relied upon by the examiner are: Rohrback et al. (Rohrback) 3,729,501 Apr. 24, 1973 Goldstein et al. (Goldstein) 4,118,414 Oct. 3, 1978 Hafner et al. (Hafner), J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 79, No. 14, pp. 3783-86 (1957). Wenker, J. Am. Chem. Soc., Vol. 57, No. 6, pp. 1079-80 (1935). Grakauskas et al. (Grakauskas), J. Org. Chem., Vol. 35, No. 5, pp. 1545-49 (1970). Claims 1-5 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Rohrback. Claims 1-5 also stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable over Rohrback in view of Hafner, Wenker, Grakauskas and Goldstein. We reverse both rejections. Opinion The examiner indicates that claims 1-5 have only been examined to the extent that they read on the elected species, 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007