Ex parte ARCHIBALD et al. - Page 2




          Appeal No. 95-3340                                                           
          Application  07/939,172                                                      


                    The claims are directed to neopentyl difluoroamino                 
          compounds said to be useful as plasticizers and oxidizers in                 
          energetic formulations such as propellants, explosives, gasifiers            
          and the like.  Appellants indicate that they have found  that by             
          placing the difluoroamino group on a neopentyl carbon (i.e. a                
          primary carbon directly bonded to a quaternary carbon), the                  
          available compounds have remarkable stability and low impact                 
          sensitivity.  See page 2, SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION.  Claim 1 is              
          illustrative of the subject matter on appeal and reads as                    
          follows :2                                                                     
                    1. A compound having the formula                                   
                                                                                      







                    in which either:                                                   
                     1  2      3                                                       
                    R , R  and R  are members independently                            
                    selected from the group consisting of H,                           
                    lower alkyl, NF , ONO , NO , N  and2     2    2  3                                     
                       4          4                                                    
          N(R )NO  where R  is H or a lower alkyl;                                     
                           2                                                           

               2                                     1  2  3         4               
            In the brief, claim 1 misidentifies R , R , R , and R  as                  
           11  12  13      14                                                          
          R , R , R  and R , respectively.                                             
                                           2                                           





Page:  Previous  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007