THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 24
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte MOTOMI ITIHASI
____________
Appeal No. 95-3348
Application 07/944,9671
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before HAIRSTON, KRASS and LEE, Administrative Patent Judges.
LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner's final rejection of claims 1 and 4. No claim has been
allowed. Claim 1 is the only independent claim.2
References Relied on by the Examiner
Japanese Laid-Open Application 63-40352 Feb. 20, 1988
(Shiga)
Application for patent filed September 15, 1992.1
The amendment filed after the final rejection, on2
November 2, 1994 (Paper No. 16), has been entered.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007