THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 10
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte FRANK L. THIEL
____________
Appeal No. 95-3798
Application 08/063,9681
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before THOMAS, LEE and TORCZON, Administrative Patent Judges.
LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner's final rejection of claims 1-16 under 35 U.S.C. §
102(b) as being anticipated by prior art. No claim has been
allowed.
Reference Relied on by the Examiner
Sakai U.S. Patent No. 4,375,598 March 1, 1983
The Rejections on Appeal
Application for patent filed May 19, 1993.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007