Appeal No. 95-4863
Application 07/865,993
than to permit operation in a higher temperature environment.
Since appellants have presented unrebutted arguments as to the
impropriety of the rejections, we do not sustain any of the
rejections. Accordingly, the decision of the examiner rejecting
claims 1 and 2 is reversed.
REVERSED
)
BRADLEY R. GARRIS )
Administrative Patent Judge )
)
)
) BOARD OF PATENT
JERRY SMITH )
Administrative Patent Judge ) APPEALS AND
)
) INTERFERENCES
)
MICHAEL R. FLEMING )
Administrative Patent Judge )
DARBY and DARBY
805 Third Avenue
New York, NY 10022
10
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Last modified: November 3, 2007