Ex parte YUAN et al. - Page 1




                                 THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                       

               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law              
               journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                               

                                                                                             Paper No. 18                           


                                  UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                         
                                                         _____________                                                              

                                        BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                          
                                                    AND INTERFERENCES                                                               
                                                         _____________                                                              

                                                 Ex parte HAN-TZONG YUAN                                                            
                                                   and ALAN C. SEABAUGH                                                             
                                                         _____________                                                              

                                                       Appeal No. 95-4959                                                           
                                                     Application 08/145,7221                                                        
                                                        ______________                                                              

                                                            ON BRIEF                                                                
                                                        _______________                                                             

               Before THOMAS, KRASS and JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                  

               JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                            

                                                    DECISION ON APPEAL                                                              

                       This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the examiner's final rejection of                

               claims 1-23, which constitute all the claims in the application.  According to appellants’ appeal brief,             

               this appeal is taken only with respect to claims 1-11.  Therefore, the appeal is dismissed as to claims 12           


                       1Application for patent filed October 29, 1993.  According to appellants, this application is a              
               continuation of Application 07/954,206, filed September 30, 1992, now abandoned.                                     
                                                                 1                                                                  





Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007