THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law
journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 18
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
_____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
_____________
Ex parte HAN-TZONG YUAN
and ALAN C. SEABAUGH
_____________
Appeal No. 95-4959
Application 08/145,7221
______________
ON BRIEF
_______________
Before THOMAS, KRASS and JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.
JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the examiner's final rejection of
claims 1-23, which constitute all the claims in the application. According to appellants’ appeal brief,
this appeal is taken only with respect to claims 1-11. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed as to claims 12
1Application for patent filed October 29, 1993. According to appellants, this application is a
continuation of Application 07/954,206, filed September 30, 1992, now abandoned.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007