Ex parte YUAN et al. - Page 1

                                 THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION                                                       

               The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1) was not written for publication in a law              
               journal and (2) is not binding precedent of the Board.                                                               

                                                                                             Paper No. 18                           

                                  UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE                                                         

                                        BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS                                                          
                                                    AND INTERFERENCES                                                               

                                                 Ex parte HAN-TZONG YUAN                                                            
                                                   and ALAN C. SEABAUGH                                                             

                                                       Appeal No. 95-4959                                                           
                                                     Application 08/145,7221                                                        

                                                            ON BRIEF                                                                

               Before THOMAS, KRASS and JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judges.                                                  

               JERRY SMITH, Administrative Patent Judge.                                                                            

                                                    DECISION ON APPEAL                                                              

                       This is a decision on the appeal under 35 U.S.C.  134 from the examiner's final rejection of                

               claims 1-23, which constitute all the claims in the application.  According to appellants’ appeal brief,             

               this appeal is taken only with respect to claims 1-11.  Therefore, the appeal is dismissed as to claims 12           

                       1Application for patent filed October 29, 1993.  According to appellants, this application is a              
               continuation of Application 07/954,206, filed September 30, 1992, now abandoned.                                     

Page:  1  2  3  4  5  6  7  8  9  10  Next 

Last modified: November 3, 2007