THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 36
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte NOBORU NAKAMARU, SHINJI SUZUKI,
TOSHIYUKI KATSU, AKIRA KIKUCHI, TATSUSHI IIZUKA,
MASAHARU SAKAMOTO
____________
Appeal No. 96-0209
Application 07/922,5011
____________
HEARD: July 14, 1997
____________
Before JERRY SMITH, LEE and CARMICHAEL, Administrative Patent
Judges.
LEE, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134 from the
examiner's final rejection of claims 1-15.22We reverse. We also
enter a new ground of rejection against claims 4-11 and 13-15.
Application filed July 31, 1992.1
The appellants' amendment filed on April 7, 1994, under2
37 CFR § 1.116 has not been entered. See advisory Office action
(Paper No. 12).
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007