Appeal No. 96-0439
Application 07/956,497
Nakatani et al. (Nakatani) 2,145,561 Mar. 27,
1985
(UK Patent Application)
Ozaki 2-131281 May 21,
1990
(Japanese Patent Application)
Claims 1 and 2 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as
being unpatentable over Appellant’s admitted prior art shown
in Figures 9 and 10 and Nakatani. Claim 3 stands rejected
under 35 U.S.C.
§ 103 as being unpatentable over Appellant’s admitted prior
art shown in Figures 9 and 10 and Nakatani in further in view
of Ozaki.
Rather than reiterate the arguments of Appellant and the
Examiner, reference is made to the briefs and answer for the 2
respective details thereof.
OPINION
2Appellant filed an appeal brief on February 7, 1995. We
will refer to this appeal brief as simply the brief.
Appellant filed a reply appeal brief on July 7, 1995. We will
refer to this reply appeal brief as the reply brief. The
Examiner stated in the Examiner’s letter dated October 19,
1995 that the reply brief has been entered. The Examiner
provides no further response.
3
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007