Appeal No. 96-0439 Application 07/956,497 ”Y-electrodes (data electrodes) and a plurality of X- electrodes (scanning electrodes) are formed in a matrix fashion in a flat matrix display panel.” Nakatani further teaches on page 3, lines 5-6, that either the X-electrodes or the Y-electrodes are divided into two groups. Nakatani teaches that in the preferred embodiment, the Y-electrodes 12 are divided into two groups (A through A and B through B ) as1 n 1 n in the case of the system shown in Figure 1. Thus, Nakatani does not teach or suggest that both the data electrodes and the scan electrodes are divided into two groups. Nakatani teaches on page 3, lines 14-44, an arrangement which solves the problem of avoiding crossing of the wiring between the LSIs. However, Nakatani does not solve the problem by providing a third outlet-terminal group as claimed by Appellant but by mounting on a circuit substrate one LSI face up and another LSI face down. Therefore, we find that Nakatani fails to teach or suggest Appellant’s claimed invention. The Federal Circuit states that "[t]he mere fact that the prior art may be modified in the manner suggested by the Examiner does not make the modification obvious unless the 7Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007