Appeal No. 96-0550
Application 07/960,148
projection display system as disclosed in Ott because Lasher is
concerned with problems associated with bilevel sampling not the
problems associated with projection display systems. There is
simply nothing in either Ott or Lasher to motivate a person of
ordinary skill in the art to combine the disparate teachings of
Ott and Lasher. In our view the only suggestion for such a
combination would have been hindsight knowledge impermissibly
derived from appellant's disclosure. See In re Fritch, 972 F.2d
1260, 1266, 23 USPQ2d 1780, 1784 (Fed. Cir. 1992). We have
reviewed the Iino reference but find nothing there to cure the
deficiencies in the rejection.
The decision of the examiner is reversed.
REVERSED
-10-
Page: Previous 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007