THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today (1)
was not written for publication in a law journal and (2) is not
binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 11
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
__________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
__________
Ex parte LOVIE A. MELKUS and DAVID J. SCHELL
__________
Appeal No. 96-1343
Application 07/993,2251
__________
ON BRIEF
__________
Before COHEN, MEISTER and STAAB, Administrative Patent Judges.
STAAB, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision on an appeal from the final rejection of
claims 1-7 and 9-14, all the claims remaining in the application.
Appellants’ invention pertains to a method (claims 1-7) and
system (claims 9-14) for controlling individual messages to users
1Application for patent filed December 18, 1992.
1
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007