Appeal No. 96-1343 Application 07/993,225 It follows that we cannot sustain the standing rejection of the appealed claims as being anticipated by Obata. Under the provisions of 37 CFR § 1.196(b), we enter the following new rejection. Claims 1, 2, 5, 9, 10 and 12 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) as being anticipated by the Spell Check program of WordPerfect® Version 4.2 (hereinafter, Spell Check). Using the language of appellants’ claim 1 as a guide, and with particular reference to pages 4 and 5 of the Speller/Thesaurus Chapter of the operation manual for WordPerfect® Version 4.2, the Spell Check program constitutes a method of controlling individual messages (i.e., the Spell Check menu displayed across the bottom of the screen) on a data process system comprising the steps of (a) detecting an occurrence of a message producing action (the absence of a match between a particular word of a document and the entries of Spell Check’s dictionaries), (b) providing a message associated with said detected message producing action to a user (displaying the message “Not Found” in the lower left hand corner of the screen upon the initial absence of a match), (c) providing to said user a selection of whether said message should be provided to the user upon future occurrences of said detected message producing action, and detecting said user selection 6Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007