Appeal No. 96-1343
Application 07/993,225
(providing to the user a selection “2 Skip” which, if selected,
causes Spell Check for the rest of the document to “ignore” the
word in question, i.e., not display the “Not Found” message when
subsequent absences of a match between the word and the Spell
Check’s dictionaries are detected), and (d) upon detections of
subsequent occurrences of said message producing action,
utilizing said user selection to determine if said message is to
be provided to said user (depending on whether the user selects
“2 Skip” or, for example, “1 Skip once,” utilizing the user’s
selection to either display or not display the “Not Found”
message upon subsequent occurrences of the absence of a match
between the word and the entries of the Spell Check’s
dictionaries). In a similar fashion, the components of a general
purpose computer programmed to run WordPerfect® Version 4.2 with
Spell Check would comprise a system having the various “means”
set forth in claim 9.
With respect to claims 2 and 10, clearly Spell Check’s step
of providing the “2 Skip” selection includes the step of
“displaying” to the user a selection of how the provision of the
“Not Found” message is to be terminated. Hence, Spell Check
anticipates these dependent claims as well.
7
Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007