Appeal No. 96-1463 Application 08/048,181 as to interlock with the deformation of said polygon, which is displayed on said simple images, and vi) a rotation means for rotating the polygons, which are displayed on said other simple images. The references relied on by the examiner are: Hernandez et al. (Hernandez) 4,686,522 Aug. 11, 1987 Iwasaki et al. (Iwasaki) 4,992,781 Feb. 12, 1991 Chiu et al. (Chiu) 5,019,976 May 28, 1991 Claims 1 through 5 and 9 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Iwasaki in view of Hernandez. Claims 6 through 8 and 10 through 12 stand rejected under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as being unpatentable over Iwasaki in view of Hernandez and Chiu. Reference is made to the briefs and the answer for the respective positions of the appellant and the examiner. OPINION We have carefully considered the entire record before us, and we will reverse the obviousness rejection. It is the examiner's position that Iwasaki discloses everything set forth in claims 1 through 5 and 9, except for 3Page: Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 NextLast modified: November 3, 2007