THIS OPINION WAS NOT WRITTEN FOR PUBLICATION
The opinion in support of the decision being entered today
(1) was not written for publication in a law journal and
(2) is not binding precedent of the Board.
Paper No. 13
UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE
____________
BEFORE THE BOARD OF PATENT APPEALS
AND INTERFERENCES
____________
Ex parte WILLIAM S. MILLER
____________
Appeal No. 96-1490
Application 08/135,8331
____________
ON BRIEF
____________
Before THOMAS, MARTIN, and LEE, Administrative Patent Judges.
MARTIN, Administrative Patent Judge.
DECISION ON APPEAL
This is a decision in an appeal under 35 U.S.C. § 134
from the examiner's final rejection of claims 1, 4-7 and 10-12
over prior art. Claims 2, 3, 8, and 9 have been canceled and
claims 13-16 stand withdrawn from consideration. No claims have
been allowed. We reverse.
Application for patent filed October 13, 1993.
-1-
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next
Last modified: November 3, 2007